Enhancing Predictive Maintenance Strategies for Naval Auxiliary Systems in Maritime Training Vessels : A Qualitative and Sensor-Based Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmicse.v2i1.256Keywords:
Maritime Engineering Education, Predictive Maintenance, Sensor-Based Monitoring, Smart Ship Technology, Training Vessel MaintenanceAbstract
Background: Maritime engineering has traditionally relied on reactive and preventive maintenance strategies, often leading to operational inefficiencies, unplanned downtime, and excessive costs. With the rise of smart ship technologies, predictive maintenance (PdM) has emerged as a data-driven solution, leveraging sensor-based monitoring and real-time diagnostics to optimize ship maintenance. However, its integration into maritime education remains underexplored, particularly in training vessels used for vocational learning. Original Value: This research contributes new insights into the feasibility, effectiveness, and educational relevance of predictive maintenance in maritime vocational training. Unlike previous studies that focus on commercial ship applications, this study examines PdM within the context of training vessels at Poltekpel SULUT, bridging the gap between academic training and industry expectations. Objectives: The study seeks to answer: How does predictive maintenance improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and reliability of naval auxiliary systems in training vessels? Methodology: A qualitative approach was employed, integrating sensor-based performance analysis, structured interviews, and questionnaire surveys involving cadets, instructors, and industry professionals. Data were analyzed through thematic categorization, cross-group comparisons, and narrative synthesis. Results: PdM demonstrated high effectiveness in reducing downtime (92/100), optimizing maintenance efficiency (91/100), and aligning with industry practices (89/100). However, challenges in sensor accuracy (85/100) and training integration were identified. Conclusions: The findings highlight the necessity of incorporating predictive maintenance into maritime training curricula to equip future engineers with the skills required for Industry 4.0 maintenance solutions, ensuring better operational efficiency and sustainability in the maritime sector.
References
Bee, M. (2017). A study into the professional identity of lecturers at a maritime education and training institute operating on the boundary of further and higher education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton].
Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters, 107, 107–115.
Chen, X., Bai, X., & Xiao, Y. (2017). The application of E-learning in maritime education and training in China. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 11(2), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.11.02.19
Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, cities, and global supply chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.
Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2020). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Routledge.
de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100173
Fitriani, R., Febriyani, S. D., Pratama, G., Andika, K., Aprilla, R., Nurfajrina, R., Suherman, D. S., & Ritonga, A. F. (2023). The influence of maritime education through project-based learning—A review. BIO Web of Conferences, 79, 02004. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237902004
Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Roumpis, E. (2022). Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-00115-2
Joseph, A., & Dalaklis, D. (2021). The international convention for the safety of life at sea: Highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2021.1873434
Kidd, R., & McCarthy, E. (2019). Maritime education in the age of autonomy. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 187, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.2495/CR190201
Mankabady, S. (1986). The International Maritime Organization, Volume 1: International shipping rules. Croom Helm.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Saldaña, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE Publications.
Sharma, A. (2023). Potential of technology-supported competence development for maritime education and training.
Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 481–494). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial and Control Systems Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.